Sign up and stay connected to your favorite communities.
I love his speech pattern, very fluid and matter-of-fact when talking about murder
Reminds me of Bullet-tooth Tony in Snatch.
Fuck I love that movie.
Was about to say great things about the man, but you found what made him really great listener and thus teacher.I could sit and just listen to him.
"Seven tricks to piss off the French, #3 will shock you!"
I love the English longbow. If I remember correctly, skeletons of these archers would be easy to tell, since their right arms were larger than their left.
TIL that If I had died at 14 I might've been mistaken for an English archer.
The evidence is all in the shoulder and back muscles, not so much the arm. The former two would have been over developed.
He said skeleton.
Which are attached to muscles
Which are covered in fat and skin
Which are made of cells
MITOCHONDRIA IS THE POWERHOUSE OF THE CELL
Here's the epic backstory of mitochondria.
they also tended to have bone spurs in their wrists and elbows.
No use in Vietnam, then
I heard another telltale sign is links between the shoulder blades wouldn't properly fuse
This would hardly be exclusive to English Longbowmen. They would have been on the end of the scale due to the bow's draw-weight, but all archers would have muscles more developed on one side.
I can’t tell if he’s a Northerner or a Midlander but his accent is so calm and his tone dulcet.
Source: am Northerner
Source: am Midlander
Nice out today innit
Ah dulcet. One of many fine words I love but never remember to use.
100% midlander. Not nottingham though, cant quite place it.Source: Am midlander.
"2 hours after church every Sunday", arrows made so that they don't come out at all. Those were the days I guess.
Yes, just not as many days for each person.
Really nice to see a quiver not at shoulder height
was that a Hollywood invention?
Only for depictions of European archers. Native American and African tribes predominantly used back quivers near the shoulder. The majority of Europeans used belt quivers.
I'm assuming because Native Americans and African tribes were more nomadic and running was more essential? Easier to run with a quiver on the back I'd imagine.
That would make sense, and Euro archers would generally either have been posted on a wall during sieges, or more to the rear of an army if in the field.
I remember from Bernard Cornwell's The Grail Quest, where the main character would describe their arrow "sack" instead of a quiver, where the later would often damage the feathers, ruining it's long range precision.
For anyone interested, u/military_history did a great summary on r/AskHistorians of the tactics of the medieval English army and how longbowmen were used in tandem with unmounted men-at-arms to provide an feared fighting machine: https://polar-ocean-4195.herokuapp.com/7777772e7265646469742e636f6d/r/AskHistorians/comments/19xrz5/if_the_english_longbow_was_so_feared_by_the_other/
This is quite weird! I know Kevin quite well! He’s a really lovely guy and very funny! Was not expecting to suddenly see his face on reddit!
"You have to look at your enemy and put him down". Oof
"...and there you have it, you've created a M U R D E R W E A P O N"
I read that muskets were effective at 100m, longbow at 300m. I figure a musket regiment was cheaper, but why when fighting Napoleon didn’t the british keep at least one or two of these regiments available for the 200m advantage?
I'm no expert, but training to be good with a bow takes a long, long time. Same with a crossbow. You need to be somewhat fit to use either or. The musket on the other hand? A lot less training. The longbow itself took years of training, while the musket would take months. Much easier and faster to arm some peasants with muskets and train them in a month, than to find some peasants and train them with a longbow over many years.
I'm sure someone more knowledgeable will correct me, but this is what I have learned so far.
As someone currently learning archery (I've got a lesson in an hour, actually), can confirm that there are techniques to every part of firing a bow. Stance, arm movements, aiming, releasing, etc. Learning it all to the point where you can shoot accurately would take way longer than learning how to shoot a gun, which is "point open end at enemy, look down long straight barrel for consistent aim, pull trigger without jerking abruptly".
Was half hoping that when the guy was showing how to shoot he would go "And then you miss because you fucked up your draw and didn't anchor properly."
Birgitte Silverbow would be proud
She'd have a much tighter pattern, and he's probably not ugly enough for her
And she would be perfectly accurate at over 300 paces.
Here's a sneak peek of /r/UnexpectedWoT using the top posts of all time!
#1: It's a common misconception that Rand Paul is named for some author | 0 comments#2: It has returned#3: I'm sad that this sub died apparently, at least for posts.
I'm a bot, beep boop | Downvote to remove | Contact ^^me | ^^Info | ^^Opt-out
Here are a few funny cat pictures for you /u/sneakpeekbot, to cheer you up!
Hello, I'm a bot and this action was performed automatically for questions pm me. Source
Nice vid. Thanks.
That was badass
So beautiful way of explaining!
This is Britain, how else do you defend your property?
like this, dur
Thoros of Myr before he found the light
Gifs, videos, etc. that teach you something.